tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451288357533743404.post5901773642884640944..comments2023-12-05T08:00:14.402-05:00Comments on On Second Opinion Blog: Historians Try to Sell Brooklyn London Bridge to U.S. Supreme Court - Part 3David E. Younghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01108309257699077532noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451288357533743404.post-31896728407154839082010-01-23T15:04:35.010-05:002010-01-23T15:04:35.010-05:00My concern is to provide accurate historical infor...My concern is to provide accurate historical information to those seeking it. Locating and providing facts about our history is important, while making guesses about what the Supreme Court might do is not.David E. Younghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01108309257699077532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451288357533743404.post-84353951398032225102010-01-23T13:04:00.677-05:002010-01-23T13:04:00.677-05:00My apology for the grammatical errors in my post y...My apology for the grammatical errors in my post yesterday. After a Samuel Adams (or 2), I should just concentrate on reading, not writing.The Rattler - IIIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16055991858730363760noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7451288357533743404.post-57731322563947400902010-01-22T18:41:36.814-05:002010-01-22T18:41:36.814-05:00Mr Young, the word patriot is used so often today ...Mr Young, the word patriot is used so often today that it hold little importance to the true definition. Please accept my sincerity in it's use now that I truly believe you to be a son of liberty in you pursuit of founder's heart. I was given your book as a gift this last Christmas. (It really was the only thing I asked for) As with your comments here, I am amazed at the confusion as to the true meaning of "shall not be infringed." It is not difficult to understand unless the goal of it's interpretation is to push forward the current progressive meaning that has been applied the last hundred years or so. It IS an inalienable right, from God to life. <br /><br />Every law today except in states like Alaska and Vermont, have been in direct conflict to this RIGHT. Do you feel that the Supreme Court will decide this year to reinstate the true meaning of the second?The Rattler - IIIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16055991858730363760noreply@blogger.com